postureco
Skip to main content

Stitching Considerations especially for Scoliosis Cases

Why Stitching Can Change Measurements: A Step-by-Step Review

Video Link: https://youtu.be/cvSaAmT3fAU?si=Tnc8zRHBUuLetlYe


1. Understand why stitched scoliosis values can change 0:01

generated-image-at-00:00:01
  • This tutorial is for advanced users stitching scoliosis sectionals.
  • The main point: measurement changes after stitching are often expected, not necessarily a software bug.
  • The changes usually come from how the x-rays were taken, chosen, and aligned.

2. Remember that each sectional is shot from a different central ray angle 0:52

generated-image-at-00:00:52
  • Sectionals are usually taken as multiple x-rays.
  • Each image has a different central ray angle, so the same vertebra can look slightly different from one film to another.
  • That changes the perceived end plates and Cobb line placement, which can alter the measured angle.

3. Prefer stitching to a new case when possible 1:40

generated-image-at-00:01:40
  • For scoliosis, it is often easier to stitch into a new case rather than an existing one.
  • This is especially helpful when the curve extends beyond the edges of the film.
  • A new case makes it easier to:
    • work with the full spine,
    • identify the true start/end of the curve,
    • compare full-spine studies later,
    • avoid confusion from re-editing an existing case.

4. Set patient expectations before stitching 3:19

generated-image-at-00:03:19
  • Tell the patient up front that the x-rays are being stitched together.
  • Explain that small measurement changes can happen because the goal is to create an overall picture of spinal alignment.
  • You do not need to explain the physics in detail—just enough so the patient understands why values may shift.

5. Fine-tuning points after stitching is normal 2:59

generated-image-at-00:02:59
  • Post-processing often places the images in the general vicinity.
  • The doctor may then adjust digitization points or even the scoliosis level after stitching.
  • That is acceptable, but it reinforces why the clinician must understand how projection affects the result.

6. Choose the correct film for the overlay 4:34

generated-image-at-00:04:34
  • A major source of change is choosing the wrong x-ray as the top image during stitching.
  • In the example, the lumbar film was placed on top instead of the thoracic film.
  • Because the overlap and visible anatomy were different, the Cobb angle changed significantly even though the points were not moved much.

7. Understand why Cobb angles are especially sensitive 6:13

generated-image-at-00:06:13
  • Cobb angles are still the standard and must be reported.
  • But Cobb measurements are highly sensitive to small endpoint changes.
  • That means even a slight difference in projection or endpoint selection can create a large change in the final angle.

8. Compare Cobb with other methods to see the difference 6:52

generated-image-at-00:06:52
  • In the example, the Risser-Ferguson measurement changed only slightly.
  • The Cobb angle changed much more dramatically.
  • This shows that Cobb is more vulnerable to projection and endpoint differences than some other methods.

9. Restitch using the better overlay image 7:18

generated-image-at-00:07:18
  • The fix in the example was to restitch without moving the points, but choose the thoracic film as the top overlay.
  • Once the correct film was used, the measurements returned to nearly the original values.
  • This confirms the issue was image selection and projection, not a software error.

10. Know the main reasons stitched values change 8:08

generated-image-at-00:08:08
  • The clinician may move points during post-processing.
  • The wrong x-ray may be chosen as the overlay.
  • The central ray differs between sectionals, so the same vertebra is viewed from a different angle.
  • All of these can cause small or large measurement differences after stitching.

11. Use full-spine AP imaging when available, but know its limits 9:00

generated-image-at-00:09:00
  • A full-spine AP image reduces some projection distortion because it captures the spine in one shot.
  • But sectionals can still be useful because they reduce distortion in the areas they cover.
  • The key is understanding that different imaging methods produce different perspectives.

12. Watch for upcoming stitching improvements 10:03

generated-image-at-00:10:03
  • Future updates to the stitching module will make it easier to see ghosted overlays, lines, and digitization points.
  • That should help users judge alignment more accurately during stitching.
  • Version 27 and later will also improve how scoliosis is handled in reporting.

13. Use scoliosis digitization more directly in newer versions 10:42

generated-image-at-00:10:42
  • In older versions, users often had to digitize with the 3-point modified Risser-Ferguson method, then restitch and redo as scoliosis.
  • In newer versions, you can digitize directly as scoliosis.
  • This saves time and still reports the Cobb angle appropriately without incorrectly labeling every small curve as a scoliosis diagnosis.

14. The same principles apply on lateral views 11:48

generated-image-at-00:11:48
  • Lateral stitching can also produce changes, though usually less than AP views.
  • That is because the lateral view looks more along the axis of rotation, with cleaner end plates and vertebral bodies.
  • Still, projection differences can happen, so the same caution applies.

15. Final takeaway 12:22

generated-image-at-00:12:22
  • If stitched scoliosis values change, that does not automatically mean something is wrong.
  • The likely causes are:
    • projection differences,
    • image selection,
    • point placement,
    • and the sensitivity of Cobb measurements.
  • The clinician should understand this well enough to explain it to the patient and to choose the best stitching workflow going forward.